Wednesday, May 30, 2018

BABOON Achilles - OVERTHROWS the KING of RIVAL troupe... + MACAQUE swimmers & MACAQUE WAR kills young & vulnerable...






 BABOONS  - ORGANIZED WARFARE between two rival troupes ends in a stalemate....
UNTIL "ACHILLES" - the dominant male of the invading troupe.... ABANDONS HIS COMRADES,  and ATTACKS the rival troupe's DOMINANT MALE, SOLO!

  In a brief fight that sees not actual bloodshed - more of a chase than a fight - the KING of the BABOON TROUPE IS DRIVEN OFF by the usurper... the SOLO USURPER,
who proceeds to BULLY and TERRORIZE the ENTIRE TROUPE....
including attacking troupe members, and eventually KILLING some of the young, so to drive the mother baboons in to estrus so he will be able to mate with them.





BABOONS in Zimbabwe: MURDER IN THE TROUPE, 
 pbs title page about a BABOON from a whole different troupe,  single-handedly  DRIVING OFF the DOMINANT MALE of another troupe...
  then TAKING OVER that troupe by sheer bravado and force...
bullying, terrorizing, and even killing troupe members, 
a troupe  he PREVIOUSLY HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH !!
KILLING RIVALS'  CHILDREN is PROGRAMMED IN NATURE... when humans do it, they call it "war" or SATANISM 
http://www.pbs.org/wnet/nature/murder-in-the-troop-video-new-leader-brings-upheaval/4426/





MURDER IN THE TROUPE: when a rival male baboon SINGLE-HANDED DRIVES OFF the dominant male, "the king" of a rival troupe  (after a territorial turf-war between the two troupes ended in a stalemate, "the king" baboon had seemingly kept his troupe - and his status - intact)
 - the NEW "king" PROCEEDS to BULLY and TERRORIZE all of the troupe members... ESPECIALLY mothers with young baboons,  who will not go in to estrus (be able to mate) until their infants are independent... or gone - dead!  One of two infant twin baboons, offspring of the fallen king, witnesses his other twin be killed by the new king.
 HUMAN SATANISTS who kidnap, torture, rape, murder, and drink the blood and eat the flesh OF CHILDREN  may CLAIM that they are "receiving powers from powerful spirits  above & beyond" - "from the king of the dark realm" - but really, all they are doing is  simply RE-ENACTING PRIMATE BEHAVIOR - KILLING the infants of  rival primates - so THEIR BLOODLINE CONTINUES with EVERY ADVANTAGE.  Although, of course, in the twisted world of Satanic cult sacrifice and degenerate human affairs, sometimes the Satanists kill their own children - as Alastair Crowley and Ivan the Terrible both did, among many other famous filiacides.
Actually, powerful rulers, kings, nobles and warlords KILLING THEIR OWN SONS is rather common, if scattered throughout history - Ottoman Sultan (emperor) "Suleiman the Great" infamously had his own most beloved, most competent son and heir EXECUTED, "Suleiman" is an Islamic version of the Jewish name SOLOMON,  and neither Solomon nor Suleiman were very wise - they both DESTROYED THEIR OWN KINGDOMS, which both disintegrated after they passed away, for the hebrew, jewish bible reports that GOD HIMSELF sicked the ASSYRIAN ARMY on Northern Israel BECAUSE SOLOMON HAD MARRIED FOREIGN WIVES and WORSHIPED THEIR FOREIGN GODS,  and when Suleiman died, his LEAST COMPETENT, LEAST FAVORED SON - "Selim the sot" - inherited the throne, simply by laying low and surviving where all his brothers had been killed!    SELIM WAS SO INSECURE IN HIS RULE, however, that - the first among Ottoman Sultans - HE NEVER LEFT HIS CAPITOL (Instanbul) TO LEAD HIS OWN ARMIES.... by DELEGATING the leadership of his armies to generals & admirals WHO WERE RIVALS,   he effectively DENIED HIS ARMIES any TACTICAL BRILLIANCE - which had been the hallmark of previous Ottoman massive offensives and campaigns - and the Europeans (Christians) were able to DEFEAT massive Ottoman armies at Vienna, at Malta, and at the naval battle of Lepanto.


  AS WE CAN SEE,  HUMAN "SATANISM
- cannibalism, blood-drinking, KIDNAPPING,
 TERRORIZING, TORTURING, 
& MURDERING of infants and CHILDREN - 

- is behavior that has roots in our primate ancestors stretching back  millions of years before today's SATANIC DEATH CULTS.... 
or even early human civilization arose. 


========================

Tuesday, November 29, 2011

As the treasonous global (human) elites push America and the world towards wider wars, it is instructive to note murderous bullying... and ORGANIZED WARFARE - in our closest animal cousins, Chimpanzees killing their own, and rival troupe members...

In the below video, Anthropologist and Yale university Professor David P. Watts explains an organized, spontaneous - or even premeditated? - murderous assault by a dozen large male chimpanzees on a member of their own troupe: 
 
Alert icon
You need Adobe Flash Player to watch this video. Download it from Adobe.
"Normally, male chimpanzees are noisy, but when patrolling they are silent. They often go in a file, and sometimes they stop and sit silently and intently listen.   If they get any sign of other chimpanzees, they get excited... but they still don't make noise."   In the below video, Watts videod many male chimps attacking one of their own troupe members, "Grapelli," before Grapelli finally made an escape and climbed a tree... where another chimp, "Hair" moved to a close tree and protected Grapelli from other males attempting to resume the attack.  3 days later Grapelli was found dead of the wounds inflicted in the biting, beating attack administered by members of his own troupe. 
http://youtu.be/CPznMbNcfO8

  In the below video, the art of gang warfare and organized violence in chimpanzees is taken to the next level: a premeditated raid into border territory between a troupe of one chimpanzees and their neighbors - as Prof. Watts explains (in our previous video, above), the chimps go silent as they intently search for signs of their "enemy" - a level of plotting and scheming immediately calls to mind human warfare's "search-and-destroy" missions, organized ambushes, and rapacious massacres - including those saturated throughout the so-called "holy" bible....

Violent chimpanzee attack - Planet Earth - BBC wildlife  

Alert icon
You need Adobe Flash Player to watch this video. Download it from Adobe.

Monday, April 16, 2007

"Planet Earth" video documents Chimpanzee warfare....

We couldn't get a screen-grab, but the excellent Discovery Channel production of their "Planet Earth" video series captures chimpanzees in what can only be described as full-fledged warfare; a large and menacing line of adult chimp males patrolling, in military line abreast fashion, towards a smaller group of chimpanzees of another troupe. As with other videos of chimps hunting or preparing to raid another troupe, the chimps are silent and stealthy as they stalk the forest; and they do so after planning and coordinating their raid in a premeditated fashion. Jane Goodall's reports of the Goombay Park (Tanzania) alpha chimp "Frodo," and other videos of Frodo, show Frodo alternately engaging in bullying behavior that puts the other chimps in a heightened state of anxiety even when Frodo isn't around - "heightened anxiety" bordering on abject terror. But in one video when Frodo leads the troop into a border patrol/border raid, the entire troop immediately calms down and reverts to stealthy behavior, instead of the loud, boisterous behaviour that Frodo appears to incite.

Frodo has long since died (after losing strength from a disease, the oversize bully was driven by the other males grown tired of his terrorizing bullying), and we don't know which troupe the Planet Earth video caught on film.

But the size of this troupe's premeditated and stealthy raid on its neighbors is startlingly similar to a human raid or warfare in the brush, with the troupe's line abreast formation maintaining almost military precision until the moment of first contact with "the enemy" troupe of outnumbered chimps. One female victim barely escapes her beating with her life (maybe to die of injuries later), and at least one male and one infant chimp are killed outright. After the fight is over, and the opposing troupe's chimps have fled the area, the victors take the carcass of the infant chimp and start tearing it apart and eating it, as they would a monkey captured in a hunt. Several chimps can be seen sharing the meat, passing it from one to the other.

From a biological standpoint, cannibalizing the infant provides some instant gratification for the victor chimps, who have exerted alot of energy and taken dangerous risks just to drive the other troupe off from this section of ground.

And, just as ironically, the large size of the victorious troupe poses just as much hazard to an individual chimp's future, as the opposing troupe does: for such a large troupe must scour the range of all available food, meaning that in lean times there will not be enough for all the chimps, and they may be brought to fighting among themselves.

All the above points out that animals do not require tools to engage in organized warfare; and that the violent impulse to compete for food or status can be organized, controlled, focused, and even planned in advance.

Saturday, March 31, 2007

Chimpanzees form tree branches into "spears" to hunt bushbabies....


Click here for National Geographic Video, "Chimps fashion spears for hunting"
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/02/070222-chimp-video.html

Professor Jill Preutz of Iowa State University, studying Chimps in Senagal, West Africa, has observed chimpanzees fashioning a spear from tree branches, which the chimps break off, strip of leaves and smaller branches, and even fashion a rudimentary point with their teeth; which the chimps then use to poke at small animals hiding in tree hollows. In this video, having wounded or killed her prey, female chimp "Alicen" jumps on the large tree branch to enlarge the opening at the base of the tree, then reaches in to sieze her wounded prey, a squirrel-sized bushbaby.

Equally fascinating as the observations that the hunter chimpanzee was using a spear-like device to (presumably) incapacitate its prey, were the study obsevations that it was FEMALE chimpanzees and their young that most readily adopted the new tools and hunting techniques. Adult males, it turns out, are often set in their ways, while females nursing and caring for young were more innovative and adaptive at using tools, which procedures their youngsters, both male and female, picked up far more readily than the adult males.

So much for the "human males developed as hunters while the females tended the fire" school of human anthropology.

(Yet still the aggressive nature of hunting large prey, and human warfare, may well have led to male-dominanted patriarchial societies.)

=======================================

Chimps Use "Spears" to Hunt Mammals, Study Says
John Roach for National Geographic News
February 22, 2007
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/02/070222-chimps-spears.html

For the first time, great apes have been observed making and using tools to hunt mammals, according to a new study. The discovery offers insight into the evolution of hunting behavior in early humans.

No fewer than 22 times, researchers documented wild chimpanzees on an African savanna fashioning sticks into "spears" to hunt small primates called lesser bush babies (bush baby photo).


Email to a Friend

RELATED
Chimps Shown Using Not Just a Tool, but a "Tool Kit" (October 6, 2004)
Pictures of Chimpanzees
Human, Chimp Ancestors May Have Mated, DNA Suggests (May 17, 2006)

In each case a chimpanzee modified a branch by breaking off one or two ends and, frequently, using its teeth to sharpen the stick. The ape then jabbed the spear into hollows in tree trunks where bush babies sleep.

(Watch new video of a chimp retrieving a bush baby hunted with a "spear.")

When hunting in the hollows, "almost without fail, every time they would withdraw the tool, they would sniff it or lick it, and then proceed to stab it in there again," said Jill Pruetz, an anthropologist with Iowa State University who led the research in Senegal.

"And they did it so forcibly that our assumption is the bush babies would have been injured if there were always bush babies in the hollow," she continued.

Anthropologist and study co-author Paco Bertolani witnessed the single case in which a chimpanzee successfully extracted a bush baby with a spear. The ape subsequently tore apart and ate the smaller primate.

Bertolani "couldn't tell for sure if the bush baby was dead or not" when it was first taken from the hollow, Pruetz said of the graduate student from England's University of Cambridge.

"But it didn't make any vocalizations, didn't attempt to escape—that sort of thing. So we are hypothesizing they are using the tools to incapacitate the bush babies."

Primatologist Craig Stanford, who was not involved in the research, called the 22 observed instances of spearmaking "good evidence."

But the observation of only "one actual kill—and no visual evidence of the spear being used as a spear—weakens it," the University of Southern California (USC) professor said in an email.

The new report was published online today in the journal Current Biology. The National Geographic Society's Committee for Research and Exploration partially funded the project. (National Geographic News is part of the National Geographic Society.)
In the 1990s Stanford observed male chimpanzees hunting colobus monkeys with their bare hands.




Enlarge Photo



Email to a Friend

RELATED
Chimps Shown Using Not Just a Tool, but a "Tool Kit" (October 6, 2004)
Pictures of Chimpanzees
Human, Chimp Ancestors May Have Mated, DNA Suggests (May 17, 2006)

The new discovery of chimps hunting with tools is "stunning," Stanford said in a telephone interview.

"Except for one anecdote many years ago, there's never really been any evidence or suggestion that chimps would use weapons when they were hunting," he said.

The earlier anecdote—reportedly based on a single observation—described a female chimpanzee's use of a tool to rouse a squirrel from a tree hollow in Tanzania.

Chimpanzees are well-known toolmakers. In the 1960s primatologist Jane Goodall famously observed chimps using sticks to fish termites out of mounds. (Photo gallery: Jane Goodall encounters chimps that are unafraid of humans.)

And Stanford's research has shown that chimpanzees are highly efficient hunters of colobus monkeys (watch video of chimps hunting colobus monkeys).

"But we've never discovered chimp populations that made the cognitive leap to put those two [skills] together and use weapons to assist in their hunting," Stanford said.

"And clearly this is what these guys are doing."

(Related news: "Chimp 'Stone Age' Finds Are Earliest Nonhuman Ape Tools, Study Says" [February 13, 2007].)

Mothers and Children

What makes the discovery all the more remarkable, project leader Pruetz said, is who the hunters are: predominantly mature females and immatures—youngsters between about two and ten years old.

"We don't think of chimpanzee hunting in terms of the females and immatures," she said.

The new finding shows that females and immatures do hunt. It also suggests that females played a role in the evolution of tool use and hunting among early human ancestral species, she added.

Chimpanzees are modern humans' closest living relatives. And Pruetz's research site is a savannah similar to the open environment that early human ancestors are believed to have moved into millions of years ago.

"Looking at our closest living relatives in a habitat that is fairly similar to what we see characterizing early hominids six million years ago" can help researchers understand early human ancestors' behavior and ecology, she said.

USC's Stanford likens chimpanzees to a window to a past poorly preserved in the archaeological record.

Hunting "is something that the chimps do that almost certainly early, early hominids did too. They were just using a material—wood—that does not leave any archaeological trace," he said.

Putting Too Fine a Point on It?

In their paper, Pruetz and Bertolani describe a deliberate toolmaking process.

The tools, on average, are about 24 inches (60 centimeters) long and 0.4 inch (11 millimeters) around.

The researchers refer to the tools as spears. Pruetz said they differ from throwing spears, in the sense that they are jabbed into tree trunks and branches, not tossed.

USC's Stanford said the word "spear" is an overstatement that makes the chimpanzees sound too much like early humans.

He prefers "bludgeon."

"They seem to be using it to hit the animal hard, and having a point on the end certainly helps," he said.

"But I think it's not clear whether the point that they made is in fact even sharp enough to penetrate the animal."

Jill Pruetz's work with chimpanzees will be featured in an upcoming NOVA/National Geographic special on PBS (airdate to be determined).

Sunday, October 15, 2006

Eureka! We discover The LINK between religion, faith, god and primate aggression....

"It put THE FEAR OF GOD in him."

"FEAR is your only god" (slogan on a Rage Against the Machine rock-band t-shirt)

Here at PrimateInfanticide we have picked on the research and observations of Jane Goodall's primate research, hours upon thousands of hours spent in the jungle with chimpanzee troupes researching the basic social structure of the troupe. And the parrallels with human society are unmistakable: the most aggressive yet cunning males become the alpha males of the troupe, dependendent not just on sheer strength and agression, but on the ability to form alliances as well - sometimes alliances of sheer coercion, but alliances nonetheless.

The rest of the troupe, faced with an alpha male secure in his primacy, must deal with their leader even when his reign is based primarily on aggression and the threat of violence. "Dealing" with an aggressive alpha usually means some form of passivity or submission - low posture, stooping, surrendering prime eating space or even food items, etc. The parrallels with human society are unmistakable: in human society the leadership regimes are very much made of aggressive alpha males who control the populace through alliances, usually alliances of their military or security forces, although in "civilized" democracies ostensibly alliances of like-minded political groups. The primate models of submission and passivity are not only reflected in human power and political body-language (i.e. bowing before kings and royalty), but indeed are THE MODELS of Religious devotion: bowing to the diety or iconography of the diety(s); an announced an proclaimed passivity to "the will of God", a devotion to "follow God" with the emphasis on the word "FOLLOW."

Clearly, primate behavior - chimpanzee behavior in the wild - has all the rudimentary characteristics of "advanced" or "CIVILIZED" human behavior, with both instantaneous and premeditated assessments of the role of the individual in relation to the power of the alphas at the pinacle of group power and influence. For example, in overthrowing an alpha male subordinate males in a chimpanzee troupe may spend time and effort planning, practising, and finally working up to the actual overthrow.

So much for our theoretical linkage of primate aggression and alpha dominance to the similar behaviors in human society.

Recently, internet commentaries and articles have discussed the impact of FEAR in our current political equation. Arianna Huffington has written several gossipy editorials on "FEARLESSNESS," and Thom Hartman has also delved into the topic of FEAR in his Air America Radio show.

Here is the word "fear" in one Hartman article, a review of a book on the roots of neo-con imperialism and the politics that sustain it, "Leo Strauss and the American Right" by Shadia B. Drury
http://www.buzzflash.com/hartmann/05/08/har05008.html


<< They [Straussian neocons] also determined that PEOPPLE MUST LIVE IN CONSTANT FEAR, and that a religion - any religion so long as it was monotheistic, PATRIARCHIAL, HEIRARCHICAL, and **AUTHORITARIAN** - must be used to "opiate" (to paraphrase both Strauss and Marx) the people.

The cynical neocon manipulation of Americans was done for the very best of reasons. After all, the ends - in their minds - justified just about any means, including the death of hundreds of thousands of people. All this brought about the ultimate irony: Strauss's fear of Nazism - and his misunderstanding of Nazism - led him and his followers to repeat many of the philosophical and political errors of the Nazis.

To understand how America got here, read Shadia Drury's brilliant book, "Leo Strauss and the American Right." Once you have, the path back to democracy will become much more clear. >>

In an EVEN MORE IMPORTANT radio commentary, Hartman (we believe it was) discussed how the response of fear DROWNS OUT or SUPPRESSES higher, deeper, more congitive thinking. When the FIGHT-OR-FLIGHT impulse kicks in, flooding the body with adrenalin in order to facilitate a rapid, energetic animal response to an immediate physical threat, all other thoughts are pushed from the mind. When you are being chased by a dog or person, you are not thinking about your next business deal.

Worse than the FEAR of "fight-or-flight" drowning out deliberative reasoning in an immediate threat environment, over time a continued habituation to fear also DROWNS OUT long-term mental development. Researchers have been able to determine that not only do certain regions of the brain respond almost exclusively to fear-based emotions, but the physiological resources given to those regions comes at the expense of "higher" or more cognitive parts of the brain.

OVER A SUFFICIENTLY LONG PERIOD OF TIME, the higher, cognitive areas will not even develop to their full extent. In a person, that would mean that primitive, reaction-based responses to daily life would tend to dominate over deeper, intuitive thinking.

Thus the passions of the mob, the instinct to fight, the tendency for male dominance in society and in an individual (eg., rape, denying a victim the right to say "no") are exhibited not only at the "low," rogue, or even criminal level... but FEAR OF THE DOMINANT MALE is THE distinguising feature of not only political leadership, but OF RELIGION as well.

Saturday, September 30, 2006

More on Violence, bullying, fear, terror... and EVIL? - in Chimpanzee life...

Here are two great posts that document the violence, fear, and terror (what we humans might call "Evil"?) that can pervade a chimpanzee troupe at certain times, either when one troupe is stalked by another troupe's males ('warriors') bent on murder or even extermination; or when, within a troupe, one male is so prone to bullying and intimidation that, as he asserts and gains power to become the undisputed alpha male, his displays become more cruel, wanton, and terrifying, subjecting the other chimps of the troupe to terror on an almost daily basis.

For more on Frodo's reign of terror see:
http://www.mc.maricopa.edu/dept/d10/asb/anthro2003/origins/goodall.html

For more on how CHIMPANZEE BEHAVIOR, including violence, social, alliances, courtship, raising the young (and sometimes brutalizing the young) warmaking, and peacemaking, are almost certainly the archetype or template for HUMAN behavior, see
MAJOR DISCOVERIES AT by Jane Goodall at GOMBE 1964-1997
http://www.webster.edu/~woolflm/janegoodall.html

Tuesday, August 01, 2006

the Alpha and Omega of human behavior: Territoriality, jealousy, infanticide, and fratricide

"CHIMPANZEE CANNABALISM AND INFANTICIDE"
I surrender all copyrights to Jens Shriver.
http://www.essaysample.com/essay/000836.html

The acts of cannibalism and infanticide are very apparent in the behavior of the chimpanzee. Many African studies show that wild chimpanzees kill and eat infants of their own species. (Goodall, 1986:151) Although there is not a clear answer why chimps engage in this very violent and sometimes gruesome behavior there are many ideas and suggestions. This essay will deal with chimpanzee aggression, cannibalism and infanticide. This paper will present information on major research studies performed in Africa and analyze how and why this strange behavior occurs in a commonly thought peaceful primate.
Wild chimpanzees(Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) are known to kill and eat mammals in various parts of Africa. Monkeys were recorded to be consumed in the Gombe National Park, the Kasakati Basin, and the Budongo Forest. Moreover, there is new evidence that chimpanzees near the Ugalla River of western Tanzania also consume mammals.(Riss, 1990:167) Cannibalism has also been recorded both in the Budongo Forest, Mahale Mountains and the Gombe National Park.
In Jane Goodall's, May 1979 article in the National Geographic called "Life and Death at Gombe" it reveals the first time that chimpanzees who were always perceived to be playful, gentle monkeys, could suddenly become dangerous killers. "I knew that some of our chimpanzees, so gentle for the most part, could on occasion become savage killers, ruthless cannibals, and that they had their own form of primitive warfare."(Goodall, 1979:594) To try and explain this ruthless behavior it is necessary to first analyze their social upbringing and unique lifestyle.
The Chimpanzee society is clearly a male dominated aggressive social unit. Males are larger than females, they are more openly aggressive, and they fight more often. (Holloway, 1974:261)
These fights can look extremely fierce and
the victim screams loudly. But it is rare
for a fight between community members to last
longer than quarter of a minute, and it is
even more unusual for such a fight to result
in serious injury.(Goodall, 1992:7)
Many fights break out suddenly. Afterwards the loser of the fight, even though clearly fearful of the aggressor, will almost always approach him and adopt a submissive posture.(Goodall, 1992:8) The loser is giving in and admitting that he has lost and only feels relaxed when the aggressor reaches out and gives what is called a "reassurance gesture-he will touch, pat, kiss or embrace the supplicator (loser)."(Goodall, 1992:8)
Another example of chimpanzee aggression is the charging display. Although females sometimes display this behavior, especially high ranking, confident females, it is typically a male performance.(Reynolds, 1967:82) During such a display, the chimp charges flat out across the ground, slapping his hands, and stamping his feet. The chimps hair then begins to bristle and his lips bunch in a ferocious scowl. He may pitch rocks or jump around swinging branches.(Strier, 1992:46) Essentially what he is doing is making himself look bigger and more dangerous than he actually is, trying to intimidate his opponents. "We have found, over thirty years of study, that the young males who display the most frequently, the most impressively, and with the most imagination, are the most likely to rise quickly to a high position in the male dominance hierarchy."(Goodall, 1992:9)
In essence, every young male chimp is on a life long quest to become the top-ranking position of the male hierarchy that is called the "alpha-male." Many of the male chimpanzees spend a lot of energy and run risks of serious injury in pursuit of higher status. The rewards of the alpha male are claiming rights to the food, female partners, and he also acquires a position exempt from attack by fellow chimps.(Goodall, 1979:616) However, the latter discussion has dealt solely with inter-group aggression, (fighting within groups of the same community); outer-group aggression is grotesquely different.
A chimpanzee community has a home range within which its members constantly roam. Usually the home range consists of roughly five to eight square miles. The adult male chimpanzees usually in groups of three, take turns patrolling the boundaries of their area keeping close together, silent and alert.(Goodall, 1992:14) As they travel they pick up objects sniffing them as if they are trying to find clues to locate strangers. If a patrol meets up with a group from another community, both sides usually engage in threats, and then are likely to retreat back to their home ground.(Holloway, 1974:261) But if a single individual is encountered, or a mother and a child, then the patrolling males usually chase and, if they can, attack the stranger.(Goodall, 1979:599) "Ten very serious attacks on mothers or old females of neighboring communities have been recorded in Gombe since 1970; twice the infants of the victims were killed; one other infant died from wounds."(Goodall, 1979:599)
In 1972 the chimpanzees of Gombe divided into two groups: the southern group(Kahama)and the northern group(Kasakela). This was the start of what Jane Goodall called the "four year war." In 1974, a gang of five chimpanzees from the Kasakela community caught a single male of the Kahama group. They hit, kicked, and bit him for twenty minutes and left him bleeding from many serious wounds. A month later after this original occurrence another prime Kahama male was caught by three chimps from Kasakela and severely beaten. A few weeks later he was found, terribly thin and with a deep unhealed gash in his thigh. There were three more brutal attacks leaving three more Kahama chimpanzees dead before 1977.(Goodall, 1979:606) By 1978 the northern males had killed all of the southern group and took over both areas. "It seems that we have been observing a phenomenon rarely recorded in field studies-the gradual extermination of one group of animals by another, stronger, group."(Goodall, 1979:608) There is no clear reason for these brutal attacks to have taken place unless that the dominant northern males before the community split, had access to the southern community and they were just trying to attain their land back. "We know, today, that chimpanzees can be aggressively territorial."(Goodall, 1992:14)
In August of 1975, Gilka a chimpanzee mother was sitting with her infant when suddenly Passion, another mother appeared and chased her. Gilka ran screaming but Passion who was bigger and stronger caught up, attacked, seized, and killed the baby. She then proceeded to eat the flesh of the infant and share the gruesome remains with her adolescent daughter, Pom and her infant son, Prof. This was the first observed instance of cannibalistic behavior shown by Passion and Pom.(Goodall, 1992:22) About a year after this incident, Gilka gave birth to another infant and this time it was Pom who seized the baby, but Passion and Prof again shared the flesh. There is no explanation why Passion and Pom behaved as they did.(Goodall, 1992:23)
Passion was always an asocial female, and
had been a very harsh mother to her own first
infant, Pom. It was only as Pom grew older
that the very close bond developed between
mother and daughter, and it was only because
the two acted with such perfect co-operation
that they were able to overcome some of the
other females of their community.(Goodall, 1992:23) During the years of their rampaging, a total of ten infants died or disappeared and every instance point to Passion and Pom.(Goodall, 1979:616) They would never try to attack a female when there were any males around. Instead they would wait for the mother to be alone with her infant and gang up on her. In three years from 1974 to 1976 only a single infant in the Kasakela community had lived for more than one month. Finally, when Passion gave birth again to a third child, and Pom also gave birth, the extraordinary cannibalistic infant killing came to an end.(Goodall, 1979:619)
Chimpanzees have been studied in the Mahale Mountains National Park for 25 years. The study group, M-group, consisting of about 90 chimpanzees, has been monitored for 15 years. "Cases reported from Mahale, Tanzania, are of special interest because adult males kill and eat those infants that not only belong to the same community but are likely to be their own offspring."(Turner 1992:151)
On October 3, 1989, a case of within-group infanticide among Mahale chimpanzees was observed.
T. Asou, M. Nakamura and two cameramen of
a video team of ANC Productions Inc. from
Tokyo, and R. Nyundo of the Mahale Mountains
Wildlife Research Centre succeeded in
shooting most of the important scenes of the
infanticide and cannibalism."(Nishida, 1992:152)
This is an example of the flagrant cannibalism and infanticide witnessed based on their memos and videotape. During a chimpanzee group feeding period that had gone unsuccessfully. Kalunde a 2nd-ranking male walked up to and snatched a six-month old infant baby boy from the hands of its mother Mirinda. Kalunde ran with the infant on his belly with Mirinda chasing after him screaming. Kalunde then hid in some vegetation until two other males Shike and Lukaja found him and wanted to take the infant away from him. Lukaja finally won a tug of war for the infant between the two other males and handed it over to Ntologi the alpha male. Ntologi, who then dragged, tossed, and slapped it against the ground climbed a tree with the infant in his mouth. He waved it in the air, and finally killed it by biting it on the face. Then he proceeded to eat the infant sharing the meat with the other chimps.(Nishida, 1992:152) It is strange because this sort of cannibalistic behavior is exactly like a group of chimpanzees feeding on the meat of any mammals dead carcass. Unfortunately, in this case though, it was the meat of a dead chimpanzee infant. Nevertheless, after the infanticide, Mirinda was observed to mate with Ntologi as well as Kalunde.(Nishida, 1992:153) Even though both these males assisted in the killing of her first infant.
Another example of this fierce and barbaric activity happened again on "July 24, 1990, M.B. Kasagula, a research assistant, observed five adult males including Ntologi excitedly displaying."(Nishida, 1992:153) Ntologi had his hand on a 5-month-old male infant of Betty's. The infant was still alive. Ntologi began to bite on the infants' fingers and then struck the infant against a tree trunk, and also dragged it on the ground as he displayed. As a result the infant was killed.(Nishida, 1992:153) Once again, Ntologi shared the remains with ten adult females and eight males. Three hours later the chimpanzees were still eating the carcass.(Nishida, 1992:153)
Other than the two examples illustrated thus far, there were also five other cases of Mahale Mountain within-group infanticides which were analyzed. Firstly, all the victims of all seven cases were small male infants below 1 year of age.(Hamai, 1992:155) Secondly, infanticide also occurred mostly in the morning during an intensive feeding period.(Hamai, 1992:155) On six of the seven occasions, the captors of the infants were alpha or beta males.(Hamai, 1992:155) Group attacks were observed in at least three cases. In all infanticide cases the mother persistently tried to recover her infant from the adult males so long as it was still alive. However, an infant was only recovered by its mother once.(Hamai, 1992:157) Infants were killed while being eaten in all cases.(Nishida 1992:157) "What appeared common in cannibalism but uncommon in predation was that consumption of meat took a long time(>3 hr) and that the carcass-holder changed frequently, considering the prey size and the number of consumers."(Hamai, 1992:158) In all cases of cannibalism, many chimps ate and shared the meat by recovering scraps. There was always more than four adult male cannibals and the mother has never been seen to eat meat from the carcass of her own offspring.(Nishida, 1992:158) The Mahale Mountain study provided an in-depth analysis on how the chimpanzees reacted during and after their cannibalistic behavior.
There are several hypotheses explaining infanticide within a group of chimpanzees. One is the male-male competition hypotheses. Nishida and Hiraiwa-Hasegawa(1985) suggested that males of one clique destroy infants of females who associated with males of a rival clique.(Hamai, 1992:159) Spijerman(1990) proposed that infanticide functions as a kind of display to fortify male social status, or "to increase control over the attention of others."(Hamai 1992:159) Another idea was Kawanaka's(1981) that infanticide was an "elimination of the product of incest."(Hamai 1992:159) Some believe that the function of infanticide is to correct a females promiscuous habit and "coerce her into more restrictive mating relationships with adult males, and especially with high ranking males."(Hamai, 1992:159) What is interesting in all of these examples of chimpanzee infanticide is as soon as a chimpanzee male or female(Passion & Pom) got their hands on an infant, the chimps surrounding them would suddenly become excited and want it themselves as if the infant was just a piece of meat even though it was still alive.
In conclusion, there has been no evidence revealing why chimpanzees act and behave in this cannibalistic fashion. There are many theories and ideas but like the theory of evolution there is no one clear answer. Being the closest living relative to the human being, chimpanzees exhibit complicated and intricate behavior due to their advanced brains.(Zuckerman, 1932:171) This paper has revealed that chimpanzees are creatures of great extremes: aggressive one moment, peaceful the next. This gruesome violent behavior can actually be linked to a similarity with human beings. It is widely accepted in the scientific community that chimpanzees are the closest human relatives we have. If we are indeed superior to these primates, does it not stand to reason that humans should be able to learn from this violence and avoid it? Jane Goodall, in her article labeled, "Life and Death at Gombe" draws a similar conclusion:
It is sobering that our new awareness of
chimpanzee violence compels us to acknowledge
that these ape cousins of ours are even more
similar to humans than we thought before.
(Goodall, 1979:620)

Click here for more papers on Chimpanzee Cannibalism, Infanticide, and primate infanticide:
http://www.termpapers.masteressays.com/